.jpg)
when architecture is made so easy, with the removal of all referents; or when the referent is so loosely defined as a confusing concept- or as a masterwork that’s perceived as being beyond analysis; or even when the work itself has gone beyond ‘being’ into the space of the transcendental; there is no other choice left but to dwell in the non-space of geometry. random choices are necessitated by a classic two pronged trap; one the impression that emptiness is necessary for ‘creativity’ to flourish, and the other a non specific critique of an alleged master’s work. the only comments then possible are comments on the skillfulness of the craft - the drawing, the model as the representation and the column and façade as the represented. it is then no wonder that a student can choose to build a representation of the entire history of architecture from the indus valley to the ‘post-modern’ as style. subject for future research – the idea of style / fashion / treatment.
manoj’s office is on the top floor of a building in the old low and middle income residential area of shastri nagar in satnacruz. 1966 built, these slabs of housing with common verandah accesses with a courtyard in between for navratri and ganpati.
a lovely scale of buildings- now up for redevelopment.
happy birthday aparna. the cheesecake ws wonderful!
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
oye! is the stuff written on the third year project purposely made so confusing! so that there is no controversy?
ReplyDeletehow complex?!?
-prachi