this is not going to be a popular post. i tried to like this film, i really did. and i did like watching some of the supporting cast. the lead pair is also sweet and good in parts and there is nothing really wrong about the film except that it begins in sweet nothingville and ends up pretty much as a ride around the block with nowhere to go. i wish the characters had more to do than be nice. i was also annoyed that i was supposed to identify with the girl who screams excitedly as the story is told to her while waiting at the airport. with her getting all worked up about silly pointless details of a wafer thin plot, i was also supposed to work up a sweat about ‘why does he not just say it?’ or go ‘how sweet’ and wait with expectant ardor at the next nothing in the story. and honestly i just did not get it. get the fluff, the comic timing, the clever writing, or fall for the chocolate boy hero; or the perky girl (i did actually). not that it is in any way offensive or annoying. in fact it goes out of the way to be as nice as it possibly can. understated to the point of bland. and though ‘pappu cant dance’ is a cheap crowd pleaser (and fun as that) the hit song is ‘kabhi kabhi aditi’. the rest of the music is 80s english pop with hindi words. the ballad (not the faux jazz title track) is like a hindi reject from a
Monday, July 07, 2008
jaane tu.. ya jaane na
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Oh, for good old tasty, tackless Bollywood, try 'Love 2050' or Chaman in love.
aargh! i had almost forgotten. think i will go watch 'jaane tu' and try harder this time to like it.
the film makes the peripheral bollywood characters - arbaz and sohail, paresh rawal look great because the main cast and plot are so weak.
u shud have seen the unedited version!!!!!!!!!!!!!
why has my considered comment not appeared - am i not good enough to comment here, huh? huh?
which considered comment paro?
i want to know!
comment eaten by a cyber monster i see...
I was just saying that I was kind of surprised by the film's flimsiness but confronted by people of all types saying - I don't mind seeing it again, I began to wonder if I'm being too curmudgeonly. But one must hold on to one's standards in a world of relativism perhaps. There's no need for me to go over the filmic problems - those are evident to all - but what troubled me was how conservative the film actually was despite this sort of liberal T-shirt it puts on. As in - no one else's love story matters except this best boy and best girl (and they are the only ones who aren't fattish, nerdish, accentedish or with coloured hair so they are best boy and girl). And then the best boy and best girl get married and then they go abroad for their honeymoon and everyone is so happy for them. I think people like this heterosexist, coupled up, but eco-friendly, non-violent sort of tale of bo-bos (bohemian bougeoisie)and that's so affirming for them, and questions their choices so little that they just don't care about the problems.
That said - I do think there were a few well observed sections in the film - her fiance and the character of Meghna, however oddly dealt with, of course Prateek Patil-Babbar's character (and amazing acting), Paresh Rawal and the cowboys. I must say the end actually worked for me because it was coherent and funny and something was happening in it - there couldn't have been any kind I think and it has a certain sweetness.
I guess my overall issue is also how trivial it all seemed and how it wasn't even quite fluff, good romantic escapism with its tongue in its cheek.
Also this new chulbuli heroine to go with the new non violent hero. Sigh...
Post a Comment