siddharth making the presentationit seems mumbai is on the international developmental radar as never before. with high real estate prices, lots of possibilities for markets and loans, everyone and their mother seems to have a stake in the city. and nowhere are the stakes more apparent than in the developmental and architectural world. as white skins of all variety seem to walk the streets (or rather hop through the five star hotels) of the city each group seems to have a fabulous solution for the ills of the city- each one more grand than the other.
meanwhile the state seems to be paying a great deal of attention to these proposals and paying none at all to the ground conditions that these grand schemes aim to replace – whole heartedly. enamored by the images of the spanking new the existing is made to have no presence at all in these new cities. this has been plaguing us in the school for a long time now and is becoming more and more apparent in the fights that we have been having over the design cell projects. the schools cess proposal, the big debate over transit oriented development proposals and fsi- all seem to be our ways of beginning to resist these mad inhuman proposals. and then there are those professionals who, eager to lick white ass and completely surrender to these forces, offer no critique at all – and on the other hand fully participate in facilitating them. they are perhaps the most dangerous of all. we hope that we don’t make too many of them.
today in the school we had the big dharavi presentation. this is a design cell project where are working with local community groups to develop a master plan for the redevelopment of dharavi that emerges from an understanding of the local. i don’t know how many you know about the infamous 'mukesh mehta plan' that has been as of now accepted by the state government. the proposal in essence treats dharavi as a blank slate and using an fsi of 4 clears large tracts of land for bandra kurla complex style commercial development. there is absolutely no cognizance of local work and living patterns or historical fabrics. communities are sliced into to create land for fancy glass clad buildings that can be sold at enormous rates. the people of dharavi have rebelled violently against this plan.
the fourth year has been working hard on this project finding real data and doing intense mapping on the site. this was presented to the local community groups and their leaders today. we were very worried of possible animosity and about the chemistry between the groups but it turned out quite well. the students had done a great job of the presentation and it helped convince even the skeptical of our intentions.
now that the project has begun and since we want to base it on a hands on real possibility lets see what kind of plan will emerge.


the meeting

vinita at the base of the huge aerial view of the slum
as an aside i thought i will include some of the other proposals recently made by architecture schools in the us and in britain for mumbai- both atrocious and incredibly disturbing. in the sci-arc proposal the city is submerged displacing everybody, and in the aa proposal for dharavi atrocious towers are built hovering over the slum cutting off light and ventilation for the entire population. i don’t know whether this is speculation, a joke, a crime or just plain stupidity and arrogance, but if one is not to get angry by this nonsense then what is one supposed to feel? both proposals do not want to deal with the real lives of the people affected and therefore choose to be superficial and pretend 'creativity'. and these schools are where many of our students and faculty have masters from. the orientalisation of the oriental. i am still reeling.


this is sci-arc.. flooding the city and making "testicular architecture" for the rehabilitation. science fiction and disaster movie- is it a wonder that the school is near hollywood.





and this is aa, london. towers over dharavi - the slums below it would seem need no light, no air- no life.
images courtesy – sahil via ninad.